Murat Ozsarac wrote:1- What l saw in Monaco and here is, some drivers don't make hotlaps in Q and gain advantage being able to change Engine Boost and some more stuff in race. If things are gonna go on this way then what is the meaning of parc ferme?
The spirit of the parc ferme rule was to save people from having to make 2 different setups for every race. Yet, if drivers prefer to cheat their way out of it, it can be re-evaluated. At best, they're trading track positions at the start for some race advantage, so it's not totally free.
2- As u all know, in real racing (not only in F1), 2 wheels rule working different than here. Curbs are not considered as a part of track. If this is a simulation league, why are things not this way as in real? (This is an acceptable case but l just wanted to say l'm not happy with this sharing u)
Our track cutting/wide exit rules are worded differently than the FIA's but still are very close to the usual, de facto, FIA tolerance levels. Rather than make a rule and not enforcing it (except mostly at Monaco chicanes), we've made both our rule and tolerance level clear (hopefully). We could use the strict FIA rules as-is but then, you'd have to bribe me to not penalize you every time you put a wheel outside the side lines. Your choice. (Please, cash only, no checks, no credit).
As yet another example of the FIA tolerance levels, Michael Schumacher has cut the pit chicane at Montreal (i.e. at the "wall of champions") all weekend long (as he has always done in the past too) and what did the FIA do? Nothing at all, not even a gentle warning (and please, don't go so low as to tell me that it was judged as "for safety reasons"). I could go on and on but there's really no point. Our rule, as lax as it appears, is usually close or stricter than what the FIA (generally) allows by not enforcing its stricter-sounding rules.
But if you're talking about changing this rule, I'd be in favor of going back to the old NAR standard of "4-wheels-on-track" at all time.
