Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 19:11
well up to now i can publicly say that you still have the last word. We only has little minor problem with new driver asking to join, your busy and cant awnser them fast, but i think we coud fix that problem with and CC mail to another member to help you on that for end of season. Being aways is not bad also, you have an away overview of situation, but not being there can have also some negative effect, but not big problem also.
A «vote de confiance» (public vote) is not a bad thing if you want too.
I woud suggest this, since we are 3/4 of season done, we coud let the season go as is.
But for 2006, i woud suggest more somthing like this. (taking in consideration we still have 3 divisions, will see later)
1 boss
3 supervisor for eatch division
(Both need to be voted by all driver of eatch end of season for next season)
The 3 supervisor will have some meeting and take care of theyr own division situation.
if problem is encounter, then the boss will have to take final decision, like a judge. The boss wont have any word to say whatever in division he his racing or not racing at all.
Only warning can be sent to the driver in fault and CC to the Boss.
No pelality can be attribute unless the boss aprouve it. Then when the Boss feel penality must be sent, he ask a vote from 3 superviser. That way no personnal feeling or angryness can interupt processus.
For rules changing or major decision on management,
the superviser take the feeling of drivers (by discussion or public vote) and discuss it with the boss and other supervisor. If a majority (4 votes yes from 3 supervisor and boss) is get, then it can be apllied to the league or sent in public vote.
Its only suggestion, Its in part from my personnal opinion and from 1-2 other drivers discussion in the past few month to try to improve the league.[/b]
A «vote de confiance» (public vote) is not a bad thing if you want too.
I woud suggest this, since we are 3/4 of season done, we coud let the season go as is.
But for 2006, i woud suggest more somthing like this. (taking in consideration we still have 3 divisions, will see later)
1 boss
3 supervisor for eatch division
(Both need to be voted by all driver of eatch end of season for next season)
The 3 supervisor will have some meeting and take care of theyr own division situation.
if problem is encounter, then the boss will have to take final decision, like a judge. The boss wont have any word to say whatever in division he his racing or not racing at all.
Only warning can be sent to the driver in fault and CC to the Boss.
No pelality can be attribute unless the boss aprouve it. Then when the Boss feel penality must be sent, he ask a vote from 3 superviser. That way no personnal feeling or angryness can interupt processus.
For rules changing or major decision on management,
the superviser take the feeling of drivers (by discussion or public vote) and discuss it with the boss and other supervisor. If a majority (4 votes yes from 3 supervisor and boss) is get, then it can be apllied to the league or sent in public vote.
Its only suggestion, Its in part from my personnal opinion and from 1-2 other drivers discussion in the past few month to try to improve the league.[/b]