Real F1 irregularities True or not

Public topics, anyone can read/write.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ruben Miranda
Posts: 1631
Joined: 05 Dec 2004, 17:33
Favorite team: Ferrari
Location: So. Calif

Real F1 irregularities True or not

Post by Ruben Miranda »

Hello All
Reading this and thinking back how true this is.
So if you think he (Hamilton) has not been and is still not being favored.

Well read on because the facts can not be rejected

To denounce the irregularities which have taken place during the 2007 F1 championship

As witnesses of the events which have taken place during the 2007 F1 championship, and as admirers of this sport, we feel obliged to publicly denounce the irregularities which have occurred, clearly showing that the driver, L. Hamilton has benefited from the favors of his team, generating serious damages for his companion F. Alonso, whose career has suffered from the lack of interest of both his team and the International Federation of Automobile.

The proven facts and presumed irregularities are the following:

G.P. of Barhein (15-04-07) Strangely, F. Alonso’s car encountered troubles in night conditions, on a statement of his own team, which prevented him from following the rhythm of his companion, whose car was functioning perfectly. L. Hamilton changed his trajectory several times, which is absolutely prohibited, but he was not sanctioned.

G.P. of Monaco (27-05-07) A few laps from the end, the team ordered both drivers to go below 19.000 r.p.m. L. Hamilton, refused to obey his team and tried to overtake his companion. Not succeeding in doing so, he complained to the FIA and the British Media after the end of the race, provoking an investigation and a high pressure on F. Alonso. The team took no measure whatsoever towards L. Hamilton, and did not support F. Alonso. Moreover, during the race, L. Hamilton frequently stepped over the continuous line when exiting the pit lane, which is totally prohibited. But he was not sanctioned in any way by the FIA

G.P. of Canada (10-06-07) Strange behavior of F. Alonso’s car. Once more, the number one car was not in the same mechanical conditions than L. Hamilton’s car.

G.P. of the USA (17-06-07) Once more, the pit stop strategies were in favor of L. Hamilton and detrimental to F. Alonso.

G.P. of France (01-07-07) Strangely, before the rain forecast, F. Alonso faced problems with his gear case during Q3, ending up on the tenth position of the starting grid whereas his companion L. Hamilton encountered no problems at all. De La Rosa explained during the race that this spare part had been perfectly identified and removed.

G.P. of Germany (22-07-07) Peculiar reaction of the race controllers when facing L. Hamilton’s slip off the track, a crane put him back on the track, creating risks of collision with other pilots. Even more peculiar is that the other drivers were not placed back on the track regarding the moment they slipped off; only L. Hamilton benefitted from an immediate return on the track. Although the rules clearly specify that a driver must turn off his engine and get out of his car, like the rest of the drivers did, he was not penalised.

G.P. of Hungary (05-08-07) A supplementary lap was given to F. Alonso in Q3. L. Hamilton disobeying his team’s orders entered the boxes to change his tyres on his own will, right behind F. Alonso, who was given used tyres. The following moment, L. Hamilton was equipped with a brand new pair of tyres. Nevertheless, F. Alonso succeeded in earning the pole position, to the apparent disappointment of Ron Dennis. Thus, L. Hamilton denounced F. Alonso again to the FIA and, consequently, he lost 5 positions on the starting grid, following the application of an inexistent rule, and McLaren also lost its constructor points earned during this race. Unexplainably, no sanction was applied to L. Hamilton after this race.

G.P. of Italy (09-09-07) L. Hamilton placed his car diagonally when positioning himself on the starting grid, and made several trajectory changes without being sanctioned.

G.P. of Belgium (16-09-07) Presumed sabotage attempt on F. Alonso’s car. His manager declared that during the free practice sessions, F. Alonso discovered that something was wrong with his power unit, asking his mechanics to revise his car, and then discovering that the top of his oil tank was missing. It is common knowledge that it only needs a simple lap to destroy a motor in such conditions.

G.P. of Japan (30-07-07) Inexplicably, F. Alonso encountered new tyre problems during Q3, as he stated himself after the qualifications. Once more, L. Hamilton obtained a supplementary lap with new tyres and a small quantity of gas, permitting him to earn the pole position. During the race, both drivers were victims of a collision. However, only the driver who collisioned with L. Hamilton was sanctioned, whereas it was F. Alonso who suffered serious damage in his car. He was not warned of the damage on his car, which led him to crash without much reaction from the members of his team. After the accident, when behind the safety-car, L. Hamilton played once more with the rules, provoking an accident between Weber and Vettel, without being sanctioned during or after the race, even when new evidence was given to the FIA.

G.P. of China (06-10-07) Once more, F. Alonso encountered problems in Q3, after having been faster than his companion during the free practice sessions, and the first two qualifying sessions. When F. Alonso was on the podium to celebrate his second position, after L. Hamilton resigned, only one mechanic from McLaren was there to celebrate the victory. After the race, Ron Dennis publicly declared that the struggle during the race was not against Ferrari, but against F. Alonso, who is now considered by his team as an opponent.

Once these facts have been analyzed, we consider there is enough evidence to confirm that the equal treatment between the two drivers has not been respected by McLaren or by the FIA with the application of the Formula 1 rules.

Consequently, with the signatures located at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/fealonso/petition.html
we publicly denounce all these irregularities and express our deepest rejection of all that has happened during this 2007 F1 Championship.

All this information has been gathered by the Safety-car forum members at:
http://www.safety-car.net.

You can sign this petition if you chose
http://www.petitiononline.com/fealonso/petition.html

You can also read it in different languages on this site.

Hitman 8)
I might not be fast, But I am ahead of you.
Ruben Hitman Miranda
User avatar
Bilbo
NAR administrator
Posts: 4895
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 02:14
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Real F1 irregularities True or not

Post by Bilbo »

Hitman wrote:Once these facts have been analyzed, we consider there is enough evidence to confirm that the equal treatment between the two drivers has not been respected by McLaren or by the FIA with the application of the Formula 1 rules.
Where were you when equal treatment between Michael Schumacher and Eddie Irvine had not been respected? :roll:
User avatar
Ruben Miranda
Posts: 1631
Joined: 05 Dec 2004, 17:33
Favorite team: Ferrari
Location: So. Calif

umm

Post by Ruben Miranda »

Hello

Bilbo Wrote:
Where were you when equal treatment between Michael Schumacher and Eddie Irvine had not been respected?
Let me see I could have been
A sleep
To young
Did not understand
might have been one of those let the race and shut up kinda guys.

But the question above well I am so old now that I don't remember yesterday and you want me to answer where I was way back when. LMAO

Hitman
8)
I might not be fast, But I am ahead of you.
Ruben Hitman Miranda
User avatar
Firefly
Posts: 129
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 20:26
Location: UK

Post by Firefly »

The FIA are even more inconsistent than my race pace.

I find some of their decisions quite laughable.
User avatar
Bilbo
NAR administrator
Posts: 4895
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 02:14
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Bilbo »

Well, I had not meant my question to Hitman personally as much as to whoever wrote the text. :wink: That was just my way of calling BS...

Note that I'm not meaning that McLaren as a team do not prefer Hamilton over Alsonso as, between the two, one appears more likeable than the other for a variety of reasons. Also, I think that King Alonso of Spain, as he has been know for (at least) the last half of the season, deserves a substantial part of the blame for alienating himself from the team. That it got to the point where it's at now though, I'd blame the team's management. Someone's in the team's management has been asleep at the wheel, leadership-wise and let things deteriorate way too far.

Anyways, many of the points raised in the text have very easy explanations without falling back to a conspiracy theory. And the fact that the people of McLaren like Hamilton more than Alonso is their own choice. That they do so openly, is not good team spirit, but it's not actually unlawful. And the "moves" of Hamilton are usually not worse than what god (to some) Schumacher ever got away with from the FIA, so it would be good to see things in perspective. Generally speaking, because the FIA often did not penalize Schumacher's antics at the time, they can't penalize Hamilton's for doing the same today (and, still generally speaking, Hamilton's antics have been pretty tame compared to Schumy's, in my opinion)...
User avatar
Coffeemachine
Posts: 775
Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 21:02
Location: Luleå
Contact:

Post by Coffeemachine »

Firefly wrote:The FIA are even more inconsistent than my race pace.

hahahahahahhahahahahahaha
[12:19:47]Dropkick: somebody tried to mug me once
[12:19:59]Dropkick: but i was so drunk i did not understand
User avatar
carrera
Posts: 1796
Joined: 01 Jun 2003, 16:04
Location: western canada

Post by carrera »

Hi fellow racers,
This may be enough to explain why they are appointing a special f1 scrutineer to look at fernandos car before the race.I think Fernando and Dennis don't talk because of this and it started many races ago.I personally hope that Fernando goes to renault and the "tainted"Mclaren team should just get another driver as Hamilton is Ron Dennis protege.He will always be the number 1 driver at Mclaren.As for the top of the oil tank missing on Fernandos car.That is just to frikkin obvious to me.I am sure Fernando knew what was going on fairly early.
p.s. Things are going good up here.More work and family is doing good now as well.Good luck in the final race.I am sure it will be interesting...LOL>..
carrera 8) 8) 8)
Quote"Once upon a time, a guy asked a girl 'Will you marry me?' The girl said, 'NO!' And the guy lived happily ever after and rode motorcycles and went fishing and hunting and played golf a lot and drank beer .The end""
User avatar
Flow
Spam kingpin
Posts: 5908
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 04:51
Favorite team: Minardi
Are you a spam bot?: No
Location: Montreal, Quebec

Post by Flow »

Stewart hits out at Mosley - FIA damaging the sport

"It is also hypocritical. Can you imagine the FIA going to Ferrari, while Michael Schumacher was at the helm, and insisting that his no.2 Rubens Barrichello or Eddie Irvine, was accorded the same privileges and that both men had to race on an equal footing?"

— Sir Jackie Stewart

McLaren will have a special FIA marshal watching McLaren at Brazil race, to see if McLaren is doing equal on both driver. Why not do that at Ferrari?

http://formula-1.updatesport.com/news/a ... /view.html
NAR.F1 driver
User avatar
Firefly
Posts: 129
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 20:26
Location: UK

Post by Firefly »

I'm not sure if this is true, but I think it's different with Ferrari because they wouldn't purposely sabotage one of their cars. They might ask one driver to let the other past, but they wouldn't actually try to make one of their own cars slower. At Ferrari the driver with less points just has to accept that they'll be playing the 'number 2' role towards the end of the season.

With McLaren I think people are worried that the team will actually do something to Fernando's car to slow him down. Neither of their drivers will accept a number 2 role.
User avatar
Bilbo
NAR administrator
Posts: 4895
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 02:14
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Post by Bilbo »

Firefly wrote:I'm not sure if this is true, but I think it's different with Ferrari because they wouldn't purposely sabotage one of their cars.
Uhhh.... What was that white powder in the gas tank ? :wink:
Post Reply