Reference time at Suzuka

Flow · Post by **Flow** » 29 Oct 2005, 20:54

Does any have refence of fast qualif and average race setup time?

For those who its a secret, no problem, i understand. But those who want to share, hehe il apreciate. The only reason is that i dont have time to spent few hunded of laps for the race, my spare time is verry limited. So practice will be precious for me.

Ive done few lap earlier these days, i did 1:35.4xx and my last year PB qualif setup says 1:34.9xx. In general, my 2005 PB are faster, but il know it soon.

Bilbo · Post by **Bilbo** » 30 Oct 2005, 00:11

From what I have seen in practice so far, I expect 35s in race setup and 34s in Q.

Steve · Post by **Steve** » 30 Oct 2005, 00:27

not from me, LOL

Flow · Post by **Flow** » 30 Oct 2005, 00:34

Steve wrote:not from me, LOL

But your consistant with your slow time

Shot2bits · Post by **Shot2bits** » 30 Oct 2005, 02:13

Hi guys,

Are we talking the normal f1c or rh2004 here?

I've a setup for a 1:32 dead with the normal f1c! I'll be more than happy to post it here in txt format

I've a 1:27,??? for RH 2004 if that helps

Chris

Flow · Post by **Flow** » 30 Oct 2005, 02:59

On NAR2005 mod

Bilbo · Post by **Bilbo** » 30 Oct 2005, 03:14

We're talking the NAR2005 mod, which is actually RH2003 physics with the 2002 track. I was also talking about what I have seen earlier this week in NA div2 practice...

If you want to post your setup(s), I believe you can just zip it(them) and attach them to a post here. Less hassle for everyone!

I'd sure wish to have a look at that setup (which is far from meaning I can drive it as fast

).

Shot2bits · Post by **Shot2bits** » 30 Oct 2005, 16:38

Hi guys,

Here is my setup for Japan 2002

Let me know what you think

Chris

Bilbo · Post by **Bilbo** » 30 Oct 2005, 21:49

It feels like a very good setup, very stable. Unfortunately, I probably couldn't drive it below the 1:34s. A quick practice brought me to flat 35s and looking at the telemetry, I probably have potential for mid-low 34s, which is pretty much my PB from last year. So the old adage is still true: a good setup does not a good driver make.

You are a very good driver to make 32s here, which is probably why you're near the top at FTL and I'm not...

Flow · Post by **Flow** » 30 Oct 2005, 22:03

Actualy i tried the setup also, verry, verry stable, but i wont say the time i did, hihi only did 3-4 laps with, and its not enough to tell if i coud do better.

With my last year setup, my telemetry says that i coud do esaly in the 1:34 low, my pb is 34.9. I need more practice and il test better your setup. Im not shure il be able to do better, but il let know later.

Shot2bits · Post by **Shot2bits** » 30 Oct 2005, 22:31

Hi guys,

I've not really driven F1 for a while! just started again with rh2004 entering times on FTL.

As for that setup I've sent, that is the actual setup I used for FTL last year, the time stamp on the setup is dated september 2004 i think LOL not to sure.

I've just tried that same setup at japan 2002 LOL the rear does seem a little loose! but that could be because i;m getting used to rh2004, so much different ( I did, and do still like the old physics) more skill is needed in my opinion LOL

Good luck

Chris

Bilbo · Post by **Bilbo** » 30 Oct 2005, 22:59

Well, in any case, thanks for sharing with us!

Flow · Post by **Flow** » 31 Oct 2005, 05:18

Well, i was not doing any better time than 36 with that setup, not same style of driving.

With my last year setup with a PB of 1:34.9 and finaly did alot of 1:36.6 easyly and even 2 or 3 1:34.2xx, so im -.8 faster than last year, only driving improvment...

i wonder how some will do in race, some was on race setup in the 35, wow, not bad.